Rama has been deceived/ The "Ad-Hoc" Commission, invented by Fatmir Xhafaj, cannot call any institution

2024-05-13 17:21:00, Politikë CNA

Rama has been deceived/ The "Ad-Hoc" Commission, invented by Fatmir

Fatmir Xhafaj and Edi Rama

After reading the Draft-Resolution distributed by exponents of the majority, the question that arises is why it is necessary for some deputies to gather in a new Commission, when each of them is currently a member of the permanent parliamentary committees. ( READ HERE )

Currently, the Assembly is involved in the usual reporting process of independent institutions, those established by special law and constitutional institutions.

In the official line of reporting, all institutions, without exception, have the obligation stemming from their own organic laws that, according to the calendar approved and announced by the Assembly and the Permanent Parliamentary Committees, report in sessions that are broadcast live from the website dedicated to this purpose.

No institution can hide from reporting!

On the other hand, the concern of Fatmir Xhafajt, who seemed to find a solution with the announcement of the establishment of a Special Commission, is a concern that has been reported in the media for months.

Fatmir Xhafaj

Then why Fatmiri and the "Xhafists" can't use the meetings dedicated to the reports of the institutions, but they have to wait some time to find the solutions after the Xhafa Commission is established?

"Jaffists" in so many months should already have clear at least the questions they will address to the institutions.

Why the problems that the "Jafists" have in their heads could not be solved these 2 months, through the re-reporting sessions, if I wanted to wait for who else than other months?

The Assembly speaks with Resolutions!

Why Fatmir Xhafaj started the open war against SPAK
May 13, 15:07
Fatmir Xhafaj's anti-American tracts
May 12, 18:01

Why don't Fatmir Xhafaj, Platent Ndreca, Klotilda Bushka, etc., include in the texts of the resolutions that the Assembly has in the process, the complaints they have with SPAK, for example?

Independent institutions do not go for reporting because that is what Fatmiri decided with the halleljes of his group. They go because the law provides for annual reporting! Also, the institutions do not make rounds in every committee, where they find a free place, but it is the regulation of the Assembly that decides to which committee each one reports.

Nowhere is it foreseen that Fatmir Xhafaj will create Special Commissions and organize summonses, reports, discussions, trials or other similar ones according to his free time. If the goal is the Integration process, the Assembly has the Integration Commission.

If that Commission has deficiencies, is not functioning, or is functioning poorly with the current leaders, then the majority has the numbers to appoint Xhafaj as the Commission's chairman and the "Xafistas" as members.

Fatmir Xhafaj, the man who seeks to end SPAK's fight against corruption
May 11, 11:44
Why Fatmir Xhafaj asked for reform on the Justice Reform
May 10, 11:39

-Why among all the existing permanent parliamentary commissions, bodies and councils, for the "examination" of the Draft Resolution, the solution was found in the establishment of a new Ad-Hoc commission whose chairman and members still remain unofficial and after the name of only rumored for this post is that of Fatmir Xhafaj?

- Why can't the annual reporting process serve the purpose that Fatmir Xhafaj has in mind?

- Why do we need a new Commission with Klotilda Bushka as a member when Klotilda Bushka can ask her own questions and propose solutions, as the Chairman of the Laws Commission?

And if Bushka was not doing his job well, let them replace him with Fatmir Xhafajn!

There is no point in the Draft-Resolution that cannot be resolved through resolutions for each of the independent institutions or through discussion during the reporting sessions that are in process.

Item 1 of the "Xhafaj" draft resolution, for example, identifies "the need to establish political and institutional dialogue between the three independent powers".

Yes very good!

Dialogue to develop during reporting! Some points of the "Xhafaj" draft resolution are statements by which the Assembly commits to respect the law.

Yes very well! The Assembly respects the law! Who was stopping him?

For example, in point 3, the Assembly commits to "effectively exercise its constitutional responsibilities regarding the supervisory role"!!!! But why couldn't I do this during the reporting process?

In point 4, the Assembly commits to "improve its legislative, monitoring and supervisory role". Where is there a better occasion than during the reports of the institutions?

Why should the Assembly first approve a resolution, in point 6 of which it promises "to set up an analytical process of assessment and recommendations with concrete legal and institutional measures that also aim at reform, with the same ambition and depth as was done with the reform in justice and other law enforcement agencies that are responsible for the fight against corruption at all levels of government and the administration of public property, crime, economic, money laundering prevention, declaration and control of officials' assets and conflict of interest , financial audit and inspection, internal control, informality or market surveillance, property administration registration, etc.", when the Assembly can do this today. During the annual reports!

The reporting institutions are not vassals of Fatmir Xhafaj and the "Xhafists". Fatmiri cannot call them whenever and wherever he wants. If the own organic laws together with the regulations of the Assembly have determined when, how and where the reporting is done, there is no place for the Institutions to go around according to the whims and inventions of Xhafaj.

And Fatmir Xhafaj cannot say: I am a legislator, I call him when and where I want! Otherwise, Fatmir Xhafaj could call them to his house! As it would actually suit him very well!/ CNA