Pressures on witnesses and the tales of Klotilda Bushka

13 days have passed since the meeting of the Socialist Party parliamentary group, on February 12, where the chairwoman of the Laws Committee, Klotilda Bushka, almost shed her crocodile tears, victimized herself, even used her children, wondering what this deputy, this chairwoman of the committee, would say to the Kalamaj and the public, since SPAK had not summoned her, etc.

In fact, what Klotilda Bushka should have said was to resign.

He has already been summoned to SPAK, perhaps he has also become familiar with the evidence , he has seen himself in person and in person intervening to destroy the evidence against the mayor of Tirana, Erion Veliaj.

And on the other hand she says: "I advised on legal matters", when in fact, she is not allowed to, because she is a member of parliament. She is not allowed to do legal consultancy, or anything like that. Get out of parliament, resign! Get a lawyer's license and continue working.

But, Klotilda Bushka lied. Now she went to SPAK as well. And tomorrow, what will she say to Edi Rama?!

Will Klotilda Bushka tell Edi Rama the evidence SPAK has, the facts it has found, the intervention she has made to destroy the evidence?

She should tell him the truth! And resign as chairwoman of the Laws Commission, if she has any dignity left, although it is rare to find it among our politicians . /CNA 

The Chairwoman of the Laws Committee, the Rilindja MP, who came from the sources of Erion Veliaj's 99-cha, today tried to act like a saint to provide clarifications before the SP parliamentary group by showing friendships, history and gossip, but in fact justice is not a story or fairy tale that Klotilda Bushka tells, her nonsense to deceive public opinion by doing politics, but it is facts, evidence and documents.

Klotilda Bushka knows very well that during the investigations she was filmed, recorded, with sound and image. According to the documents issued by the court, there is no prosecutor's decision in this case, but there is a court decision, documents that we published yesterday that we have that you can read here, that intimidates the former director to take responsibility for the crime and also offers her money in case she needs it and this is evidence in the file.

Stories of friendship, help, and others should not lead to obstruction of justice, concealment of evidence, or its manipulation.

Klotilda Bushka is a member of parliament and cannot practice law. You can help her, but you are not allowed to give legal advice.
So even with the weapons she uses, she "killed" herself.

You can help them, you can give them legal advice and so on, but when they start calling witnesses, offering them money and asking them to change their testimony, it is a criminal offense and we are not dealing with stories and novels, but with facts and concrete evidence and criminal liability , and since our prime minister said that this type of investigation and this type of form that the famous SPAK was conducting and the court was giving us does not happen in any country in Europe, we are actually asking him a question: in which country in the world, if such a fact and evidence were found as Klotilda Bushka has, would she remain in office, no longer as chairwoman of the Laws Committee, but as a member of parliament?

In what country in the world would a chairman of the Law Commission who is the number 2 man in parliament go and call witnesses and discuss money matters and changing testimony? In what country in the world could this happen?

Therefore, what Klotilda Bushka said at the meeting of the SP parliamentary group are not simply Klotilda Bushka's tales./ CNA 

One of the most interesting episodes explained in the 366-page file of accusations against the Veliaj-Xoxa family is the request for a meeting between Klotilda Bushke and a witness.

Klotilda Bushka went to the institution where the witness worked and called her to a meeting in the office of the head of the institution.

The head of the institution provided Ms. Bushka with all the necessary amenities, making her office available for the conversation with the official. The conversation was not related to the institution's work, but was about Ms. Bushka's personal concerns.

The incident took place at the Office of the Ombudsman. The welcoming official who created all the comfort for Ms. Bushka is called Erinda Ballanca.

"The declarant explains that while she was working in the office of the Ombudsman, at around 2:30 p.m., the institution's driver, a citizen named Tasim, called her that someone was looking for her from outside. The driver then told her to go to the Ombudsman's office. The declarant explains that when she entered the office, she found the Ombudsman Erinda Ballanca and citizen Klotilda Bushka there. The declarant explains that at first I greeted both of them, then citizen Klotilda Bushka winked at her, a gesture that she (the declarant) understood as a signal not to tell what had happened to me during May and December and the meetings she had had.

After some conversations on personal topics, the declarant explains that the state Erinda Ballanca has left the office and is left alone with Klotilda Bushka. The latter has started to ask her if she is better and if she has calmed down from the situation created last month. Also, Klotilda Bushka has asked her if she had any concerns from Spak, asking her if she had been called again. The declarant has replied that she has not had any concerns and is very calm.

The declarant further explains that Klotilda Bushka told her that she had a concern about the declarations to the HIDAKKI that she herself was making, referring to the invoice she had in her file issued by her husband Altin Bushka, for the NATO 2022 activity, and asked her who was aware of this invoice. The declarant told her that she had only spoken to Greta Kokalari about this invoice and that she had then written to Altin, telling him that he should make an invoice.

The declarant states that Klotilda's concern was whether or not this conversation about the invoice in question was held with Adela Kondakçi, as it actually happened. However, the declarant denied such a thing. At one point, the declarant explains that Klotilda Bushka expressed herself by saying that "Adela has brought us many consequences and is a negative person with whom we have collaborated" - the file states.

Among other things, Ina Goxhaj stated that Klotilda Bushka told her that if she were called to SPAK again, she would be represented by a lawyer, while asking her not to talk to anyone.

"The declarant explains that Klotilda told her, 'Don't worry, no matter what, you'll have us. And please don't talk to anyone on the phone.'"

The declarant explains that state representative Klotilda Bushka has asked her several times not to talk about the incident on the phone. 

Then, the declarant explains that citizen Klotilda Bushka told her that if she was called back to Spak, she should not tell how Klotilda had taken her phone.

"Klotilda Bushka, the declarant explains, instructed her that if she were to be questioned by the proceeding body regarding the phone, she should declare that she had had the current phone (the one given to her by citizen Ajola Xoxa) in her home for years and had simply put it into use recently," the file states.

In the end, the declarant revealed that while saying goodbye to Klotilda, the latter told her, "For anything you need, even money, just tell us."

Where would Klotilda Bushka find the money, how much was she willing to pay, and to which office would the state hand it over to the witness if she gave the deal?/ CNA

CNA has secured the decision of the Criminal Court of Kosovo, which also reveals the role of Klotilda Bushka, how the socialist MP is involved in criminal activity, in defense of Erion Veliaj and Ajola Xoxa.

The court has concluded that all of the statements made by the former director of BYUL, Ina Goxhaj, were true, that her phone was taken away to be destroyed and she was given a new iPhone by Ajola Xoxa.

Goxhaj has revealed that he felt pressured after being told by Klotilda Bushka not to reveal anything and to deny everything related to Ajola Xoxa.

"Also, the statements of this citizen regarding the change of her mobile phone are found to be supported by the results obtained from the letter No. FRS/3056/IB dated 26.12.2024, received by the proceeding body from the company Vodafone Sh.a. From this telephone company, information has been administered that the telephone number +355696152417 is registered in the name of citizen Ina Goxhaj, with personal No. 185524116P, date of birth 24.05.1988, for which the form of the user of electronic communications services has also been completed. Attached to this form is a copy of the Identity Card in the name of citizen Ina Goxhaj, with Personal No. 185524116P, issued on 06.05.2009. Likewise, the telephone company has made available the phone calls/sms, which reflect the numbers that have called or were called by citizen Ina Goxhaj, for the period 01.12.2023 to 18.12.2024, along with the IMEI identifiers of the interlocutors.

136.2.3. From the material analyzed for outgoing calls, it is evident that from 01.12.2023 until 10.12.2024 at 20:07, this telephone number was used on the mobile phone with IMEI 356835259288980. The last outgoing call was at 20:07, with a duration of 10 seconds, to the mobile phone number 0695528178. The last incoming flow turns out to be an SMS from Vodafone at 22:51 on 10.12.2024. In the following, it is reflected that for the telephone number +355696152417, from 11.12.2024 at 8:35 to 12.12.2024 at 11:35, a telephone number with No. IMEI 358934999288980. This coincides with this citizen's statements regarding the use for a few hours of another device, which must belong to her mother.

Then, from the material analyzed for outgoing flows, it is evident that from 13.12.2024 at 02:38 and until 18.12.2024 at 14:19, the telephone number of citizen Ina Goxhaj was used on the device with IMEI 357014745814170. The first incoming flow for this IMEI is on 13.12.2024, at 02:36, in the form of a message, while the last incoming flow is on 18.12.2024, at 17:44, in the form of a message. These data coincide with the statements of citizen Ina Goxhaj regarding the change of her mobile device. In conclusion, the fact is proven that until 10.12.2024 Ina Goxhaj had a telephone with IMEI 356835259288980 and since 13.12.2024, citizen Ina Goxhaj has changed her telephone with IMEI 357014745814170. From open sources it results that IMEI numbers that start with 35 belong to iPhone brand telephones. This data also coincides with the statements of the citizen in question, related to the replacement of her Samsung brand mobile phone with an iPhone brand device, "the Court's decision provided by CNA states.

Further, former director Ina Goxhaj said that Bushka called her to the office to tell her not to talk to anyone about the things she knows and offered her money to keep her mouth shut.

"Questioned again on 17.01.2025 as a person who has knowledge of the criminal offense, citizen Ina Goxhaj explains, among other things, that:

He was contacted again by state representative Klotilda Busha on Tuesday.

The declarant explains that while she was working in the office of the Ombudsman, at around 2:30 p.m., the institution's driver, a citizen named Tasim, called her and said that someone was looking for her from outside. The driver then told her to go to the Ombudsman's office. The declarant explains that when she entered the office, she found Ombudsman Erinda Ballanca and citizen Klotilda Bushka there.

The declarant explains that at first I greeted both of them, then, state official Klotilda Bushka winked at her, a gesture which she (the declarant) understood as a signal not to tell what had happened to me during the month of December and the meetings she had had.

After some conversations on personal topics, the declarant explains that the state Erinda Ballanca has left the office and is left alone with Klotilda Bushka. The latter has started to ask her if she is better and if she has calmed down from the situation created last month. Also, Klotilda Bushka has asked her if she had any concerns from Spak, asking her if she had been called again. The declarant has replied that she has not had any concerns and is very calm.

The declarant further explains that Klotilda Bushka told her that she had a concern about the declarations to the HIDAKKI that she herself was making, referring to the invoice she had in her file issued by her husband Altin Bushka, for the NATO 2022 activity, and asked her who was aware of this invoice. The declarant told her that she had only spoken to Greta Kokalari about this invoice and that she had then written to Altin, telling him that he should make an invoice.

The declarant states that Klotilda's concern was whether or not this conversation about the invoice in question had taken place with Adela Kondakçiu, as it actually did. However, the declarant denied this.

At one point, the declarant explains that Klotilda Bushka said that "Adela has brought us many consequences and is a negative person with whom we have collaborated." In this regard, the declarant explains that Klotilda ordered her several times during the conversation not to talk to Adela and not to have any kind of communication with her. Klotilda Bushka even told her not to have any communication with her (the declarant's) family members regarding the meeting she (Klotilda) had.

Then, the declarant explains that Klotilda Bushka told her that her lawyer would call her to ask how she was, as she was very worried about her situation. Also, RE Klotilda Bushka told her that Romina could call her, regarding a power of attorney that she (the declarant) would issue and sign. If she were called back to Spak, Klotilda Bushka told her that she would be represented by a lawyer. The declarant agreed to sign the power of attorney that was proposed to her. The declarant explains that Klotilda told her "don't worry, for anything, you will have us. And please don't talk to anyone on the phone". The declarant explains that the citizen Klotilda Bushka asked her several times not to talk on the phone about the incident.

Then, the declarant explains that citizen Klotilda Bushka told her that if they called her again in Spak, she should not tell how Klotilda had taken her phone. Klotilda Bushka, the declarant explains, instructed her that if the proceeding body were to ask about the phone, she should state that the current phone (the one given to her by citizen Ajola Xoxa) had been in her house for years and had simply been using it recently and finally the declarant states that while greeting Klotilda, the latter told her, "If you need anything, even money, just tell us," the GJKKO decision disclosed by CNA./CNA

Another scandal involving the Veliaj-Xoxa couple came to light earlier, revealing another link in the corrupt chain that includes the mayor of Tirana and his wife, but also other political figures such as socialist MP Klotilda Bushka.

"Balkan Youth Link Albania", founded in 2002, according to the GJKKO decision revealed by CNA, also reveals the role of Klotilda Bushka, who together with Ajola Xoxa received cash from fictitious invoices.

Ina Goxhaj emphasizes that BYL-A's work after 2016 was organized at the offices of Ajola Xoxa's "Partners".

The declarant explains that Ejona Isufaj told her to apply for a project at the American embassy "Model Nato". She explains that she contacted Erald Ismaili and Greta Kokalari, who had also written the project. She explains that the documentary part of the letters was done by Greta Kokalari, while the financier was Adela. Ina Goxhaj explains that the final meeting for this project was held at the "Dajti" hotel, and explains that all the time Ina had to consult with Ejona about how and where the project would be developed.

Regarding this project, Ina Goxhaj says that there were some concerns, both about its implementation after it was delayed, but also about reporting to Klotilda about the implementation of the funds (despite the fact that Klotilda was not involved in this project or had requested reconciliations), a concern she shared with Adela.

Likewise, the declarant claims that during the implementation of this project, there were fictitious payments in cases where the experts were known to the organizers, received payments and then returned them in cash, values ​​which were received from Klotilda, Ajola and in some cases Ejona.

For this project, he explained that he had contact with Altin Bushka, Klotilda's husband, regarding the bill for internet service that he should have simply recorded as an expense item.

"BYL-A's work after 2016 was organized at the offices of 'Partners', where Ina Goxhaj says that she was employed as a secretary, office coordinator, and had a position at the reception, but at the same time she also did work for BYL-A. She was not paid for her work as The Partners' secretary, as she received her salary from BYL-A. She says that in 2017 she left The Partners after being replaced by another girl, and she remained unemployed for two years, despite being the Executive Director of BYL-A, she did not receive any payment.

The declarant explains that Ejona Isufaj told her to apply for a project at the American embassy 'Model Nato'. She explains that she contacted Erald Ismaili and Greta Kokalari, who had also written the project. She explains that the documentary part of the letters was done by Greta Kokalari, while the financier was Adela. Ina Goxhaj explains that the final meeting for this project was held at the Dajt Hotel, and explains that all the time Ina had to consult with Ejona about how and where the project would be developed.

Regarding this project, Ina Goxhaj says that she had some concerns, both about its implementation after it was delayed, but also about Klotilda's reporting on the implementation of the funds (despite the fact that Klotilda was not involved in this project or had requested reconciliations), a concern she shared with Adela.

Likewise, the declarant claims that during the implementation of this project, there were fictitious payments in cases where the experts were known to the organizers, received payments and then returned them in cash, the value of which was taken from Klotilda, Ajola and in some cases Ejona.

For this project, he explained that he had contact with Altin Bushka, Klotilda's husband, regarding the bill for internet service that he should have simply recorded as an expense item.

Regarding BYL-A, after 2022 and after the American embassy project, Ina Goxhaj says that from the way events unfolded, she understood that BYL-A was Ajola's. Asked about the decisions made at BYL-A after 2022, she explains that they did not depend on her. She says that it was implied that there was another person responsible for decision-making. She explains that her name is Ajola Xoxa, but she did not communicate with her directly, but through Adela or other Harabel girls, who brought her documents for signature. Ina Goxhaj says that she only had the name of leader but no role," the GJKKO decision revealed by CNA states./ CNA