web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

E fundit!

x

How Ylli Manjani and the government media lie about the Constitutional Court's decision regarding the seizure of phones

2026-01-15 13:16:00, Aktualitet CNA

How Ylli Manjani and the government media lie about the Constitutional

The Constitutional Court has released decision 44, dated July 29, 2025, where the appellant was Oneida Omeraj, who appealed to the Constitutional Court the seizure of her cell phone by SPAK.

Oneida Omeraj's phone was seized due to the investigations being conducted by the Special Structure regarding former Deputy Prime Minister Arben Ahmetaj.

Ylli Manjani reacted and made a long post, coming out with points, saying that "the investigations are now over, the evidence found on the phones has been disproven, everything is worthless, his thug clients will be released, SPAK is in trouble."

We must not forget that Ylli Manjani has recently gone from being a great enemy of the government to its servant, mainly in the case against SPAK, because he is a lawyer who is paid tens of thousands of dollars to defend his clients.

And he has taken up the sword of battle against the Special Structure that fights crime and corruption, with the same language as Prime Minister Rama spoke a year ago when Erion Veliaj was arrested, but Ylli Manjani has it even harsher. He also appears in the media, sells himself as an independent analyst, as a commentator, when in fact he is a lawyer and in a clear conflict of interest with SPAK.

And this is the fact why Ylli Manjani lies about decision number 44, of July 29, 2025, of citizen Oneida Omeraj.

The Constitutional Court's decision gives SPAK the right to seize phones. Furthermore, it emphasizes that it can seize phones to collect evidence in an investigation situation, it is a necessary and urgent action. The Constitutional Court accepts this. So, the OPGJ can seize phones in urgent situations.

But what did the Constitutional Court say? After this phone is seized, in order to obtain relevant evidence of the communication of the person who has the phone, with a criminal, with another person for corruption, with a suspect who may be arrested, etc., the phone must be transferred to a court decision, to obtain from the mobile device only the segment that serves the investigation.

So, the Constitutional Court has granted the right for SPAK to seize phones, but says that before the phone is disassembled, permission must be obtained from the court for a specific segment to be taken from this phone.

So, not everything can be taken from the phone, because the phone has photos, it may have personal videos, with thousands of communications with other people, but according to the Constitutional Court, after seizing the phone, SPAK or prosecutors must go to court to obtain permission to disassemble the phone into segments that are of interest to the investigation.

So, this is what the Constitutional Court said. You cannot take and disassemble the entire phone and then take the parts you need and have the other parts as well. No. You will only take the parts that serve the investigation. The other parts that are telephone, personal, communications with other people, must be deleted and should not be taken to be administered by judicial police officers or prosecutors for investigative matters.

This lie that Ylli Manjani told after the Constitutional Court's decision was also written and spun by the Veliaj family newspaper, published by Mero Baze, once Sali Berisha's servant, who shares the same opinion as Ylli, although Mr. Manjani, as always, is harsher and more savage. After Veliaj's arrest, he also became the government's scapegoat.

However, the Constitutional Court's decision does not give what the government media reports, that the investigations have been dropped, the evidence has been dropped, there is no more evidence. But it says that when the phone is taken, evidence is secured for the certain part of the communication between the person holding the phone and the other person under investigation or the suspect, and the rest of the private materials should not come out and should not be published. On the contrary, care should be taken that these are hidden and disappear so that they do not remain in any other place. And this is a normal decision of the Constitutional Court. It does not overturn the investigations of SPAK, it does not overturn the seizures of phones, on the contrary, it only gives the part of the segment that must be authorized by the court.

But now, this decision of the Constitutional Court has not overturned the investigations. None of the investigations have been dropped. Despite what is said to have been dropped, that has been dropped. None have been dropped. Whether Ylli Manjani likes it or not, Mero Baze likes it or not, whether he likes it or not, whether he likes the zdroms that unites the two of them, which has now been moved from the Durrës prison.

The Constitutional Court's decision legitimizes all phone seizures, but orients a certain segment of actions that should be taken with the phones.

It's so simple, in so few words. The rest is political nonsense from people used and abused by Erion Veliaj to fraudulent reports that are carried across the ocean. /CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga