web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

E fundit!

x

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly sessions

2024-08-13 17:08:00, Aktualitet CNA

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly

Afrim Krasniqi

In an appearance on VOA, Afrim Krasniqi, on behalf of the ISP, made several announcements which are claimed to be reports of the institute he directs.

The announcements deal with the topic of conflict of interest, so they deserve to be treated with care.

The institute, despite its great name, until today has no figure who has ever represented it in public.

Every time Afrim Krasniqi speaks, it is said that the Institute is speaking.

Therefore, the name he has given to the NGO he owns (INSTITUTE), does not show or speak about the greatness of the organization where Afrim Krasniqi is in fact the full owner.

For years, Aftim Krasniqi has been receiving funds from foreign donors to investigate the conflict of interests, mainly in the Parliament of Albania.

Without stopping at the report, we take and analyze only the statements of the owner of the ISP, in his last appearance at VOA.

The total figure benefited by Afrim Krasniqi for his own institute, which investigates the conflict of interest, is not known, but the topic takes on special importance despite the amounts paid to signal conflicting MPs.

Even in cases where facts, events, findings, suspicions are published in the media, due to a pure conflict of interest, Afrim Krasniqi does not feel like doing any investigation. Not even a legal analysis of the case.

Carefully follow the sentences used by Afrim Krasniqi:

"...we have seen that there is a massive use of informal talks and consultations with interest groups, with private firms and companies, which are in violation of the conflict of interest law."

What article and point of the law on conflict of interest is related to the finding that Afrim Krasniqi is talking about? He declares that he saw it. Where did he see it? Who was there when Afrim Krasniqi saw him and which article of the Law was violated and by whom?

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
Afrim Krasniqi

"Directors of parliamentary committees, which have to judge and approve a law or an agreement meet with individuals who benefit from these agreements and all these meetings are not documented."

Who is or who are these leaders?

And what is the article of the conflict of interest law that was violated in that case?

The articles of the law on conflict of interest, unlike Afrim Krasniqi's statements, speak clearly. The conflict has to do with PRIVATE BUSINESS and the use of the chair to serve private business.

The official is forbidden to serve as such, when he encounters interests for his own private BUSINESS.

Which private business has Afrim Krasniqi identified for the heads of the Commissions? In what business do the heads of the Parliamentary Commissions play and why does Afrim Krasniqi not declare names, dates and chronology of meetings? Why does Afrim Krasniqi, who is paid for this work, not report the scheme, the events, the meeting, the persons in the meeting and the relevant act approved by the Assembly?

Where does Afrim Krasniqi expect to find the facts? Reading the minutes of the Assembly?

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
ASSEMBLY

The Assembly has provisions on lobbying and provides rules for declaring lobbying. Is Afrim Krasniqi clear about the difference when he talks about conflict of interest and the difference when it comes to lobbying?

Or since he is paid only to investigate the conflict of interest and he does not understand the conflict of interest, or they cannot investigate it, he makes a mess of everything.

From what Afrim Krasniqi says, it is clear that he includes abuse of office (which is a criminal offense), lobbying (which is an activity allowed and regulated by the Assembly), and public consultation (which is a legal obligation). .

And putting it all in one bag as "conflict of interest" justifies the funds received without ascertaining and analyzing the real concrete cases of conflict of interest. The conflict of interest cannot be institutional for Afrim Krasniqi to take and treat the Assembly as an institution in conflict of interest.

There can be no conflict of interest without a named official on the one hand and the official's business with a description of the object of activity on the other hand.

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
Afrim Krasniqi

"Parliament does not own any document of these talks, while it is publicly declared that a compromise has been reached with them and a solution has been found, such as gambling or strategic investments and other topics with great financial impact", says Mr. Krasniqi.

Where did Afrim Krasniqi ask for the documents and they didn't give them to you? Do you want to find them in the minutes of the meetings of the Parliamentary Committees?

The people say "it's better to know than to have" and Afrim Krasniqi has plenty of funds to investigate the conflict of interests of the MPs.

"...beyond these, during the monitoring on the conflict of interest, the ISP found that the parliamentary mechanism for the prevention of the conflict of interest is non-existent, does not work, while the ILDKPKI (High Inspectorate for the Declaration and Control of Assets and Conflict of Interests) trusts this institution to do preliminary investigations before the case goes there."

What Afrim Krasniqi says is a lie. Anyone can forward to ILDKPKI suspected cases of conflict of interest. But the suspicion must be accompanied by the investigation of the case, and the investigation requires mind and capacities. He doesn't always need funds, but Afrim Krasniqi has them. Why don't you investigate?

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
HIDAACI

"If you constantly look at public meetings, meetings of commissions on large financial values, and in the statements that are made there, it is said that the law has been consulted, agreed, etc., and if you ask: Where are the talks? Where are the negotiations? Who were the requests and why was this request tolerated or not? How much has the government and independent institutions been asked? How much has the law been respected? - there is no answer for these things, but it is said that these are personal negotiations. The lack of documentation for these issues will make it impossible to investigate the cases tomorrow", says Mr. Krasniqi.

Why doesn't Afrim Krasniqi investigate today? Or is he being paid to ask someone who is not being paid to volunteer to investigate?

Why don't you officially submit your questions to the institutions? The right to information is also offered to Mr. Krasniqi. FREE!

The frequent, unreferenced use of the term "conflict of interest" in the law of the field creates reasonable suspicions, based on formal logic, that Mr. Afrim Krasniqi has never read the law on conflict of interest.

Otherwise, he wouldn't mix concepts so badly as if he is at the tower chimney in winter.

"To be singled out is the fact that it is the same deputies who judge in ethics on reported cases of conflict of interest, the same ones who lead the commissions, and the same ones who make decisions for themselves at the conference of presidents and at the Bureau of Assembly and this in itself is another conflict of interest."

Can a person be paid to say this sentence?

"In this legislature there are two or three alleged cases of incompatibility of the mandate of the deputy and this fact means that the abuse of the principles of the code of conduct has progressed to extraordinary levels and is incomparable to past legislatures."

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
Afrim Krasniqi

What is Mr. Krasniqi's opinion on "alleged cases" of conflict of interest? It is not claimed that it was Mr. Krasniqi who had denounced them, (although he is paid for this work), but at least do not do the analyst from a distance, when the cases are denounced and complaints are also filed in the country's Courts.

As Afrim Krasniqi reads the conflict of interest and the collection of terms and then crushing them to put everything in the bag of terms for which he is paid, it makes it difficult to evaluate the cases when it is claimed that the Parliament did not consider the complaints institute owned by God Krasniqi.

"ISP has brought 3 cases to the Assembly, where certain deputies have been in open conflict of interest, or commissions have been in conflict of interest, (the case of the election of an official by the Parliament, when the Parliament itself admitted that he is in a conflict of interest) ."

Regarding the term, "Commissions in Conflict of Interest", apologizing for the ignorance, we ask God Krasniqi that if he cannot clarify it publicly, he will do so in one of his reports.

The ISP that does not investigate but simply reads the minutes of the Assembly
Afrim Krasniqi

It's so bad that ISP operates with the terminology when speaking to the media, imagine what it could have proposed in the package it claims to have submitted to Parliament for legal change

Since we are in the Assembly, we suggest to Mr. Krasniqi that after reading the law on conflict of interests, he should also take a look at the Constitution.

To see what is said there and about what is considered a legislative initiative. That the ISP did not post the proposal incorrectly and then complain why the Assembly did not consider it!

This country didn't take seriously people who knew what they were talking about, imagine dealing with others who obviously don't even know what they're being paid to report on./ CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga