web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

The two arguments that speak against Sokol Sadushi

2026-03-10 14:17:00, Aktualitet CNA

The two arguments that speak against Sokol Sadushi

Sokol Sadushi, the unveiled soldier of the Renaissance, has become part of a shame, a scandal, for serving the arrested mayor of Tirana, Erion Veliaj, in Durrës prison.

The man who should not have been part of the justice system, for the simple reason that his colleagues passed the vetting, while he "went out the window and came in through the door", without passing the vetting, a gift from the Renaissance, Sokol Sadushi has committed actions, the ultimate goal of which is the release of Erion Veliaj from prison.

Sadushi's movements have recently begun, where on February 16 he held a meeting with students of the Faculty of Law of the University of Tirana, following the ongoing dialogue between justice institutions and the university community, and delivered a speech on the topic: "Pre-trial detention as the 'first choice': returning to the constitutional and convention standard of security measures."

The two arguments that speak against Sokol Sadushi

In this case, Sadushi uses the prime minister's terms such as detention or presumption of innocence, taking on the role of the minister or the prime minister himself.

The shame of the Supreme Court, and its President Sokol Sadushi, deepens further after he has also issued personal decisions without passing them on to the Criminal College of the Supreme Court.

The CNA has brought the interim decision taken by Sadushi on March 9, which exercises this competence for the first time, to initiate the procedure for the partial amendment of the unified practice of the Joint Panels of the Supreme Court of 2011 on personal security measures.

In this decision taken on March 9, 2026 by Sokol Sadushi, it is emphasized that it has been decided:

1-Initiation of the procedure for the partial amendment of the unified judicial practice, regarding decision no. 7, dated 14.10.2011 of the Joint Panels of the Supreme Court.

The two arguments that speak against Sokol Sadushi

The two arguments that speak against Sokol Sadushi

Through this, Sadushi seeks to make procedural changes that ultimately lead to changing the criteria for imposing the security measure, thus serving Erion Veliaj as a major embarrassment to the head of the Supreme Court and his friend Mero Baze, a mercenary journalist and suicide bomber of the Veliaj family. 

CNA goes further by bringing two arguments against Sadushi's initiative.

1-Lack of demand from interested parties

There is no request from any interested party urging the institution, the Supreme Court or the president to initiate this interim decision.

2-The issue of institutional competence

A decision of the United Colleges is not reviewed by a united college if it is to be reviewed as an initiative of the president.

The second argument is related to the fact that a decision taken by the Joint Panels of the Supreme Court should be reviewed again by such a collegial structure and not be launched as an individual initiative by the president of the institution.

So, the lack of a request from any interested party and the issue of institutional competence are the two arguments that overturn the interim decision taken by Sadushi to "initiate the procedure for the partial amendment of the unified practice of the Joint Colleges of the Supreme Court of 2011 on personal security measures"

As we emphasized in previous articles, Sokol Sadushi is simply putting on a masquerade to serve Erion Veliaj, which can also be used as pressure on the Constitutional Court./ CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga