E fundit!

12:22 TODAY

Part of Laert Haxhi's group, GJKKO makes decision on the repentant justice

The Criminal Court of Kosovo has sentenced Artan Tafanin, ...

DOCUMENT/ Prosecutor Dritan Prençi tried to destroy the evidence for the Fier incinerator

2024-01-04 13:32:00, Politikë CNA

DOCUMENT/ Prosecutor Dritan Prençi tried to destroy the evidence for the

Fire incinerator

The member of the Presidency of the Democratic Party, Belind Kelliçi, has denounced today that the prosecutor Dritan Premço has deliberately destroyed the evidence for the Fier incinerator that implicates Damian Gjiknuri, Armando Subash, Engjëll Agaçi and many other officials of the Ministry of Finance.

According to Këlliç, judge Flojera Davidhi on March 24, 2023, finally decided to "Send the case to trial for the Fieri Incinerator".

According to him, in its decision it is emphasized that the investigations carried out by the SPAK Prosecutor's Office, Dritan Prençi, are incomplete, shallow, partial, deviated, and selective.

"Prosecutor Dritan Prençi, during his investigations, administered as evidence part of the investigative file the Audit Report of the High State Control December 2018 and the Financial Audit Report of the Ministry of Finance December 2020. Many of the responsible officials, who needed investigated, they were not investigated by the Prosecutor D. Prençi, even though there was evidence against them of suspicions based on the irregularity of the exercise of the function. These actions of the Prosecutor Dritan Prençi exceed the disciplinary responsibility towards him, and are illegal actions punishable by criminal law , as it is the Prosecutor Prençi, who in this particular case turns out to have intentionally committed the criminal offense of "Abuse of Duty", provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code", said Këlliçi.

FULL STATEMENT:

Today with new facts and evidence for hiding documents and evidence in the Tirana Incinerator file!

On 05.12.2022, Special Prosecutor Dritan Prençi communicated to all the persons under investigation the decision on "End of Investigations", for criminal proceedings no. 187/2020.
On 19.12.2022, the Prosecutor presents to the Special Court of First Instance the "Request for the transfer of the case to trial".
On 24.03.2023, the Judge of the Preliminary Session, Flojera Davidhi, completed the judicial examination of the request of the Special Prosecutor's Office dated 19.12.2022 for "Sending the case to trial".
INCOMPLETE AND ONE-SIDED INVESTIGATIONS

In the Fier Incinerator case, the Judge of the Preliminary Session, Flojera Davidhi, with her decision no. 26, dated 24.03.2023, in the end decided to "Send the case to trial for the Fier Incinerator". In her decision, point 100, Judge Davidhi, evidences through reasoning that the investigations carried out by the SPAK Prosecutor's Office (Prosecutor Dritan Prençi) are incomplete, shallow, partial, deviated, and selective.

Prosecutor Dritan Prençi, during his investigations, administered as evidence part of the investigative file the Audit Report of the High State Control of December 2018 and the Audit Report Finance of the Ministry of Finance, December 2020.

Many of the responsible officials, who should have been investigated, were not investigated by Prosecutor D. Prençi, even though there was evidence against them of suspicions based on the irregularity of the exercise of their functions.

These actions of Prosecutor Dritan Prençi overcome the disciplinary responsibility towards him, and are illegal actions punishable by criminal law, since it is the Prosecutor Prençi, who in this particular case turns out to have intentionally committed the criminal offense of "Abuse of Duty", provided for by Article 248 of the Criminal Code.

The disciplinary and criminal responsibility of Prosecutor Prençi is clearly proven by the assessment made by the judge of the preliminary hearing in decision no. 26, dated 24.03.2023.

The investigations carried out by the Prosecutor Dritan Prençi are incomplete, because many people with high or medium public functions have deliberately avoided the investigation and criminal responsibility.

This deviation of the criminal investigation, this illegality, has brought about the favoring of persons who are not part of this criminal proceeding.

Here is what the Special Court (of the preliminary session) says exactly, in point 100 of Decision no. 26, dated 24.03.2023.

“100. Për herë të parë, shkelje të mundshme që lidhen me procedurat e dhënies me koncesion, ndërtimin dhe monitorimin e zbatimit të kontratës koncesionare për objektin: “Ndërtimi dhe administrimi i impjantit të trajtimit të mbetjeve urbane qarkut Fier dhe prodhimit të energjisë” u evidentuan nga Kontrolli i Lartë i Shtetit, i cili me vendimin nr. 236, datë 21.12.2018 “Për evadimin e materialeve të auditimit të performancës “Menaxhimi i përpunimit të mbetjeve të ngurta në impiantin e Bashkisë Fier”, të ushtruar në Ministrinë e Infrastrukturës dhe Energjisë, Ministrinë e Turizmit dhe Mjedisit, Agjencisë Kombëtare të Mjedisit dhe Bashkinë Fier.

Më pas, nga një inspektim i bërë nga Ministria e Financave kanë rezultuar një sërë shkeljesh që lidhen me procedurat e dhënies me koncesion dhe zbatimit të kontratës koncesionare për të njëjtin objekt.

Duhet theksuar se, Prokuroria e Posaçme, pavarësisht konstatimeve të këtyre dy organeve shtetërore, ka shtrirë hetimet vetëm lidhur me zhvillimin e procedurave për dhënien me koncesion të objektit: “Ndërtimi dhe administrimi i impjantit të trajtimit të mbetjeve urbane qarkut Fier dhe prodhimit të energjisë” dhe zbatimin e kontratës koncesionare për periudhën deri në kohën kur Autoritet Kontraktor ka qenë Ministria e Mjedisit, ndërkohë që nuk janë shtrirë hetimet lidhur me miratimin e dhënë nga Ministria e Financave për draft kontratën koncesionare lidhur me mënyrën e shlyerjes së kësteve të mbështetjes financiare; monitorimin e zbatimit të kontratës koncesionare nga ana e Njësisë së Zbatimit të Projektit; procedurën e miratimit të Lejes Mjedisore, si dhe procedurat për ndryshimin e vendodhjes së vendit ku do të ndërtohej objekti (pavarësisht konstatimeve të bëra nga administrator i shtetit, që ndryshimi i vendit ku do të ndërtohej Inceneratori ka çuar në kosto ekstra të konsiderueshme dhe ka zvarritur procedurat për pajisjen me leje ndërtimore duke ndikuar kështu në zgjatjen e kontratës).

Gjykata, duke çmuar , që në këtë rast nuk ka detyrimin të procedojë sipas nenit 329 të K.Pr.Penale, por shtrin kontrollin e saj, lidhur me sa është paraqitur nga Prokurori në kërkesën për dërgimin e çështjes për gjyq, dhe procedon sipas neneve 332/c, 332/ç dhe 332/d, e duke dalë me vendim përfundimtar sipas nenit 332/dh të K.Pr.Penale, në kuadër të detyrës kushtetuese që ka organi prokurorisë për ushtrimin e ndjekjes penale dhe të ndarjes së pushteteve midis organeve, e lë në vlerësim të organit të akuzës të kryejë verifikimet përkatëse përsa rezultojnë nga këto akte.

Pra Gjykata ka evidentuar në vendimin e saj se, ka persona të tjerë që duhet të ishin hetuar dhe të mbanin përgjegjësi penale, por nuk janë hetuar nga Prokurori Dritan Prençi.

Prokurori që ka për detyrë të kryejë hetime të plota, i mbyllur hetimet shpejt e shpejt dhe nuk ka hetuar shtetasit që përmenden në aktet e kontrollit të KLSH-së dhe Ministrisë së Financave.

So, the most important part of this issue, which is related to the officials who supported the financing scheme of the Concession Contracts in open violation of the law, has been deliberately left out of the investigation and trial. The unprecedented scheme that includes concession contracts with very special provisions, and which contradict the very purpose of the law on concessions, should also be the main issue in the criminal investigations of Incinerators.

The serious violations found in the above-mentioned decision constitute an obligation for the initiation of procedures by the institutions of Justice, according to the legal provisions in force.

Dear citizens,

In simple words, today we are explaining to you that it is precisely the prosecutor Dritan Premçi, the person who deliberately destroyed the evidence directly implicating in the Fier incinerator affair, for Damian Gjiknur, Armando Subash, Engjëll Agaçi and many other headlines of the Ministry of Finance, JPZP, etc.

While today, as we have presented to you over the past 3 weeks, the same prosecutor is hiding the data of the confidential report of KLSH, is hiding the audits carried out by the Ministry of Finance, is hiding the evidence which is reflected by Altin Dumani in the investigation file for Arbe Ahmetaj, where Erion Veliaj and Edi Rama are directly implicated.

As you can see, these are absolutely neither political accusations nor interpretations that could denigrate the figure of the prosecutors.

We are simply presenting to the Albanian citizens and the justice institutions themselves, official state documents which are deliberately left out of the focus of the investigation by the justice system itself, in order to close once and for all the mega affair of the incinerators, which should have been investigated as a structured criminal group./ CNA