Documents - Ajola Xoxa's SCHEME, how she used employees to "inject" money

2025-02-28 10:02:00, Denoncim CNA

Ajola Xoxa

Another scandal has emerged from the SPAK investigation file, revealed in the court decision by Judge Erjon Bani.

This time it's about how Ajola Xoxa's wife used her employees in the money "injection" scheme.

The case we will present today concerns citizen Ines Dani, a lawyer, who was a natural person whose offices were in Ajola Xoxa's company.

As a natural person, Ines Dani should not expect her invoices to be made by someone else, but should generate income through her own activity.

But according to the communications revealed in this decision, Ines Dani is simply Ajola Xoxa's "machete" to inject money.

Millions of lek from Abule, TKOB to Ajola Xoxa/ The messages of the financiers that reveal them
February 26, 1:11 PM

COMMUNICATIONS AND DETAILS

Ines Dani asks Adela on 20.05.2019 : I definitely need an invoice. Because I'm so bad with declaring my income. I have a lot of expenses and no income. I have credit, credit cards and of course I eat in the meantime. I can't justify it. PLEASE TELL AJOLA. I'll tell her too, but maybe you have contact sooner for such things.

Adela Kondakçiu : Ok, I'll talk to you when I meet with him. Because, as far as I know, you don't have any bills to pay.

Ines Dani: I don't know what to say. I'm in a difficult situation. I FEEL LIKE THEY'RE HIDDENING INCOME...when I have this income. I'm very worried. Above all, it puts my husband, who is in a government job, at risk.

Adela Kondakçiu: To be honest, I have an idea. You should have discussed this before the opening of NIPT. However, if necessary, maybe we can find a solution. I'll talk to Ajola.

Ines Dani: Yes, but it was thought that I would be billed more. So, I would have income. No. I opened a NIPT and no billing. This is a joke. We have talked together about what the average turnover and income would be. 5 months have passed and nothing. How many times do we need to talk??? OF COURSE THIS IS NOT YOUR PROBLEM. I AM TALKING ABOUT THE OFFICE.

Adela Kondakçiu: We have talked together about minimum and maximum turnover. Not about billing values ??as far as I remember. Anyway, I talked to Ajola because she sets the billing.

Ines Dani: We talked about how much my NIPT might cost. I asked you about this because I was interested in knowing what would happen to my expenses.

Adela Kondakçiu: Yes, then. How much can the limit go. ACCORDING TO THE INTEREST OF THE OFFICE. Ines Dani replies: Ok, but please as soon as possible. They are starting to ask me for expenses, then hang on. BUT HOW MUCH IS REALLY BILLED IS DETERMINED BY SOMEONE ELSE.

Ines Dani: Yes, that's right. But not Zero. I have ZERO at all. Do you understand? NO ONE TOLD ME THAT ZERO WOULD GROW FROM SEED. Adela Kondakçiu: WE WILL DISCUSS IT WITH AJOLE, BECAUSE IT'S NOT MY DECISION.

Ines Dani: I will talk about it too. But please speak up too. Understand me. I KNOW WHO DECIDES. But as the office's financier, I am also asking you to talk about this situation.

Adela Kondakçiu: I'll talk to him as soon as I have the chance.

On page 112, the production of invoices in the name of citizen Ines Dani is again evidenced, for services that were not performed by the latter, and of which it seems clear that she has no knowledge. Not only that, the commercial entities that request the service, that is, those who pay the money, in this case result to be closely linked by financial interests to the Municipality of Tirana.

Specifically, on page 112, citizen Adela Kondakçiu informs citizen Ines Dani : I have made another invoice from you today.

So, Ines Dani has no idea about the service she provided, the entity to which she provided it, and of course about the invoice that was issued. This is because the first person to mention this invoice and notify her of its issuance is Adela Kondakçiu, without at any time asking this from the citizen Ines Dani.

Next, on page 113, Adela sends Ines Dani a sales tax invoice with a photo.

Specifically, it concerns invoice no. 15 dated 26.11.2020, issued by the natural person Ines Dani, in the capacity of the seller of the service, for the commercial entity "FUSHA" shpk, in the capacity of the buyer of the service.

The invoice shows that Ines Dani invoiced "FUSHA" shpk for legal consultancy services in the amount of 9,000 euros + VAT, a total of 10,800 euros, which at the current exchange rate of 1 curo-123 lek, is calculated at a value of around 1,328,400 lek (including VAT).

After reviewing the bill, Ines Dani simply says to Adela: ok .

But at this point, always on page 113, Ines Dani remembers to ask for something that is of great interest to the investigation, as long as she proves the transfer of money for fictitious invoices from commercial entities linked to the Tirana municipality to her account as a natural person, and while on the other hand, she shows the mechanism of passing these illegal benefits through bank accounts until the complete closure of the cycle of the destination of the money, highlighting quite clearly in whose favor they end up.

Specifically, Ines Dani, after reviewing the bill, says to Adela: " Make us a table of the incoming and outgoing payments from my account, so I know how much is mine and how much is not."

Adela Kondakçiu replies: Yes, I will. Ines, this was the situation until the end of October with the withdrawals, if you withdrew in November, it must be deducted from the remaining value, i.e. this value of 357,219 lekë.

From the table sent to citizen Ines Dani, it results that the total in the account of citizen Ines Dani is 965,149 lekë, which consists of the existing balance of the account, Ines's salaries (May-November) (while she is a natural person).

The withdrawals made by Inesi, in the months of June-October, according to the table, are 607,930 lekë and the remaining amount to be withdrawn is 357,219 lekë.

To clarify the uncertainties of the proceeding body regarding this table, and essentially to answer the question of how much citizen Ines Dani actually benefits from her work as a licensed lawyer as a natural person, this citizen herself has thought about this in the communications on page 117.

After learning about the table, Ines Dani asks Adela Kondakçiu : Are 357 mine?

Adela Kondakçiu answers: Yes.

But, citizen Ines Dani, after clarifying how much money was hers and how much was not, turns to Adela, saying: ADELA, I WILL ALSO TALK TO AJOLE, BUT FIRST, IF YOU NEED TO WITHDRAW MONEY FROM MY PF (INDIVIDUAL PERSON) ACCOUNT, TELL ME IN ADVANCE SO I CAN GIVE IT TO YOU AND DO NOT WITHDRAW IT FROM THE ACCOUNT. (CONFIDENTIAL THIS).

So, first of all, it is clear that in the account of the natural person Ines Dani, it is not only its holder who has access, but also Ajola Xoxa. Not only that, but this communication proves the fact that the income generated de jure by the natural person Ines Dani, in one way or another, in this specific case through withdrawals from the account, is received by the citizen Ajola Xoxa.

Regarding this request, Adela Kondakçiu tells Ines Dani that this time the payment, as Ajola had told her, would be made differently.

Specifically: On page 134, in response to Ines Dani's request not to make a withdrawal from her account as a natural person, Adela Kondakçiu says: AJOLA TOLD ME THE PAYMENT WILL BE TRANSFERRED TO HARABEL IN FACT. What was said in this communication is proven by the bank records recorded in the account statement of the NGO "Harabel".

So, in this specific case, according to Ajola Xoxa's instructions, the money will not be taken directly from the account of the individual Ines Dani, in the form of CASH, but will be transferred by bank transfer to an NGO fully controlled by the citizen Ajola Xoxa. This has actually happened and is the same mechanism used by the other individual who practices law in the offices of "Partners Lae", the citizen Greta Domi.

Ines Dani has only one answer: Ok

Adela Kondakçiu continues the discussion regarding Ajola's idea, telling Ines Dani: INES WE CAN SPEND 4,000 EUROS PLUS VAT TO SHRINK THIS YEAR AND THE OTHER PART NEXT YEAR.

In other words, the amount of money that in this specific case is transferred from "FUSHA shpk" to the individual Ines Dani, for legal consultancy services, by order of Ajola Xoxe is then partially transferred to the organization "Harabel".

In conclusion, the proceeding body has concluded that the mechanism mentioned in the communications made between financier Adela Kondakçiu and lawyer Ines Dani, registered as a natural person, for the withdrawal of cash and transfers to Ajola Xoxa's NGOs controlled by Ajola herself, made by entities that have benefited from the Municipality of Tirana, proves the path followed for the laundering and injection into the banking system of illegal benefits secured by the wife of Mayor Erion Veliaj, Ajola Xoxa./ CNA