Sadushi accepts only 19% of Albanians' criminal appeals, plus Erion Veliaj

2025-11-05 14:08:00, Aktualitet CNA

Sokol Sadushi's High Court, year after year, has increasingly taken on the face of President Sadushi.

And this also applies to the statistics of throwing files in the trash as unworthy of the legal aristocracy that develops in the Supreme Court.

Thus, if the figures for reviewing appeals in administrative matters have regularly been above 70%, with an average of 74%, with the record held in 2023 with 78%, in criminal matters the figures differ by a significant margin.

How does Sadush select 'administrative', when he throws 74% of the files with the problems of Albanians in the trash?
November 5, 12:52

In 2023, the Supreme Court accepted for review only 49% of appeals in criminal cases.

But in 2024 this figure is 19%.

If we look at the trend, it is only in increasing percentage for files that are thrown into the trash.

That is, year after year, fewer and fewer files are accepted for review.

Only 19% of Albanians who have been referred to the Sadushi High Court for a justice issue have entered the criminal panel for review in 2024.

We do not know today, so we cannot analyze, which files and which criminal offenses are in question. We do not even know how the Supreme Court acted in reviewing them. For example, how much it changed and how much it reversed. We do not even know what criminal offenses are in question and who the lucky defendants are.

Only 30% of files are saved from being thrown into the trash at the Sadushi Court
November 4, 15:49

Even less do we know what the criteria were for how Sadushi selected the files. Sadushi does not reveal this!

But we know a case that is worth analyzing! Maybe we even understand the criterion? Or at least one of them!

Erion Veliaj appealed to the Supreme Court, requesting a change in his prison sentence. Erion Veliaj's appeal was accepted!

How many cases where the same thing is requested are accepted by the Supreme Court?

Or does the Supreme Court accept and submit for review all cases where the applicant appeals and requests a change in the security measure of imprisonment?

How come Eri has others?

If there is, but they are treated differently, what is the criterion that distinguishes one from the other? The lawyer? Or "other strong arguments", which are unknown to the public and do not find explanation even from the official documents and reports of the Supreme Court, which personifies and speaks only with the voice of Sadushi?

The Criminal College of the Supreme Court upheld the security measure for Erion Veliaj.

But what is the criterion that Sadducees use to select us, when at the end of the review nothing changed?

We would be open to options if the measure of lali had changed in the Supreme Court. Then we would say, the criterion would be the irregularity found in the file. But the measure did not change!

What are the criteria that the Sadushi Court applies for throwing out or accepting appeals for consideration by the criminal panel? What unites those cases that make up 19% of appeals that deserve to cross the Sadushi court's table?

As long as the criteria are kept secret (81% sure they don't exist), then this has only one explanation! It's called abuse of office or worse, corruption and influence peddling.

Sokol, for hell, has the offer "like a shower" in its name. /CNA