web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

"Why didn't you act like Kryemadhi"/ Berisha talks about the non-implementation of the court's decision

2024-11-26 11:57:00, Politikë CNA
"Why didn't you act like Kryemadhi"/ Berisha talks about the
The head of the DP, Sali Berisha

The head of the Democratic Party, Sali Berisha, was invited to MCN TV, where he was asked why he did not implement the court's decision on the security measure "obligation to appear" requested by SPAK, just as Monika Kryemadhi did, who is free despite investigations by SPAK and Berisha would not end up under house arrest.

Berisha replied that he did not reject the court's decision because the Constitution requires that the decisions be legal. Every order sanctions that the unlawful order shall not be enforced.

The leader of the opposition declared that what was decided was a coup d'état within the state, taking the power of the Parliament from the judges to give it to Edi Rama.

"This is an extra-Constitutional reasoning. Why? I rejected the court's decision because the Constitution requires that the decisions be legal. Every order sanctions that the unlawful order shall not be enforced. Secondly, what was decided was a coup d'état within the state, taking over the power of the Parliament, from the judges to give it to Edi Rama.

I was the person who had sent in 2012 the amendment for the abrogation of Article 73 of the Constitution, which forced the judicial bodies to obtain authorization from the Parliament, before imposing restrictions on the MP's freedoms, any freedom.

This was categorically opposed by Edi Rama. The Council of Europe also opposed it, so I was also clear that those judges wrote the Constitution with their decision, I could not be part of a coup, of people who have no law and morality.

The CJK, again in its decision, testifies that the decision was anti-Constitutional, because according to them it violated the principle of proportionality, a principle sanctioned in Article 17 of the Constitution. Why did I bring it up here? Because the court decision was anti-Constitutional. There is another article, 15, which states that rights and freedoms are indivisible. If one or three or five individuals decide to take a hostage or enslave, decide to write the Constitution or violate it, I never do it. Even in law, in letter, in spirit, and in precedent, in the case of Tahir, it could not happen without the approval of the Parliament. With me, a handful of thugs never created an anti-Constitutional precedent. They could never do it. I was not the one who could violate the Constitution", said Berisha./ CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga