How Sokol Sadushi hid the file, KED received information that Asim Vokshi was an informant or secret service agent

2025-11-09 17:29:00, Aktualitet CNA

How Sokol Sadushi hid the file, KED received information that Asim Vokshi was an

Other compromising facts have been added to the doubts about the selection of the member of the Constitutional Court by the Supreme Court.

The President of the KED, also of the Supreme Court, Sokol Sadushi, hid important information about candidate Asim Vokshi from the panel of 15 Supreme Court judges during the voting process.

It is about the information of the national security institutions that judge Asim Vokshi was an informant or agent of the intelligence services. But the violation starts from another important link such as the Judicial Appointments Council, which this year is headed by Sokol Sadushi and which did not function according to the law.

Created as a collegial body with 9 members that must verify the conditions of candidates running for constitutional office, the KED headed by Sokol Sadushi is suspected of not fulfilling its duty to verify judge Asim Vokshi, whose name was then passed to the general meeting of judges.

This decision dated June 17, 2025 was issued at a time when the institutions had submitted compromising data to the KED indicating that candidate Vokshi should not be further qualified since there was a prohibitive criterion provided for in point 89/c of ??decision number 4 of 2019. Specifically, the data provided by TCH show that the KED was submitted information from security institutions mentioning that the candidate was a collaborator, informant or agent of intelligence services.

But despite all the information that should have been read later by the KED as a prohibitive criterion, the data was not evaluated, not seen and overlooked during the evaluation and judge Asim Vokshi was listed on June 17, 2025 to continue the competition.

The submission of this data is said to have occurred during the integrity verification that included several institutions, including the general prosecutor's office, DSIK, and the authority for former state security documents, who followed the protocol and submitted their data, but the nine members of the KED did not see or read it, placing Asim Vokshin first on the list./ Top Channel