The game at the Constitutional Court, where nothing is as it seems

2025-11-04 10:35:00, Aktualitet CNA

It began with a 2-1 decision to admit Veliaj's appeal for consideration. Of the 3-member panel that considered whether or not to accept the appeal, only one was in favor. The other 2 were against. According to them, the case should not have been handled by the Constitutional Court.

But the decision in the trio must be unanimous, otherwise it goes to the judges' meeting.

And the decision from the meeting was taken 8-0, in favor of having the issue of Veliaj's appeal against the decision to dismiss him by the Council of Ministers be handled by the Constitutional Court.

The decision aimed to conceal the majority's position, but especially not to identify them by name.

They would see and do on the road!

From Rama's antechambers, confidential information was revealed that Veliaj's complaint was being made so that he could use it in the Strasbourg court. So he was being given a favor. Even the dismissal was being done because it would be more favorable to him in Strasbourg. Better dismissed!

Erion Veliaj could actually benefit from arriving in Strasbourg even at the cost of being dismissed due to a disproportionate security measure. This would be a direct and provable consequence that due to the disproportionate imprisonment, dismissal had resulted. Because the law does not see the motives for the absence, it simply establishes it.

Veliaj's defense in the Constitutional Court only talked about imprisonment. It seemed as if Veliaj was seeking to get out of prison and not that he was contesting a dismissal decision due to absence. Veliaj's lawyers were seeking dismissal for serious violations of the Constitution and laws, which they did not have.

The government had only dismissed him for absenteeism, regardless of the reasons.

Veliaj was interested in the dismissal!

Veliaj is awaiting the High Court to review his appeal against the arrest measure. In his appeal, after the approval of the Council of Ministers' Decision, the lawyers argued with an addition that Veliaj can no longer destroy the evidence, since he has already been dismissed from his post as mayor. The dismissal therefore saved Veliaj from the measure of arrest in prison. From home, he could not destroy the evidence that is in the office.

After a 7-hour session broadcast live at Veliaj's request, the Constitutional Court convened quickly.

Constitutional Court ousts Rama/Veliaj defeats Prime Minister
November 3, 17:22

If it didn't coincide with the weekend, it could be said that the court convened for a decision the day after the hearing.

The decision was 5 to 3, against Veliaj's dismissal.

First, by making the dismissal unusable in Strasbourg. But by not removing the obstacle to changing the security measure.

Veliaj wanted propaganda and the creation of a profile as a victim of politics and the justice system from the Constitutional Court hearing.

I made a "victory" decision, which from today I can no longer use anywhere.

That decision is not useful in the Supreme Court, where in a few days the lifting or modification of the security measure will be considered.

That decision no longer serves Strasbourg, either, because the system worked. The system did not allow him to be dismissed due to imprisonment. There was debate, but there was no dismissal!

Meanwhile, the 5 members who practically voted to leave Veliaj in prison are names associated with Edi Rama, except for one who listened to the man on how to vote.

Marjana Semini, Fiona Papajorgji, Ilir Toska are close connections to Sokol Sadushi and Edi Rama's left. Sandër Beci is a direct connection to Taulant Balla.

Meanwhile, Marsida Xhaferllari's vote was previously declared by Alibeaj.

The trio that voted against seem to have been more inclined towards upholding the dismissal, doing Veliaj a favor.

In all this history there is one thing in common with other histories. And that is the indiscriminate use of the vote in collegial bodies by the leftist majority. By a majority, for which the goal is enough to exploit and exploit every human resource as a means to achieve the goal. The destruction of institutions, their disfigurement, the delegitimization of decision-making, the merciless exploitation of those selected by the majority itself, is the consequence.

Of course, the Constitutional Court would not be able to escape this collapse.

So yesterday, apart from a few empty-headed people, some of whom were separated by the windows of Veliaj prison and some by television studios, setting off fireworks for the "victory", no one else was happy.

Neither Veliaj!/ CNA