web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

Jamarbër Malltezi: Confrontation with the subjugated "hallexhej".

2024-01-16 19:42:00, Aktualitet CNA
Jamarbër Malltezi: Confrontation with the subjugated "hallexhej".
Jamarbër Malltezi

Tomorrow GJKKO will hold the session where Jamarbër Malltezi is expected to be interrogated, but his defense lawyers wrote a letter to this institution stating that the participation of the member of the Presidency of the DP is not possible.

For the session at GJKKO, there was a reaction from Malltezi himself on social networks.

He expresses his position regarding the "Partizani" case, while accusing SPAK prosecutors.

Jamarbër Malltezi lists some documents which he claims were hidden by the prosecutors or were not referred to the court.

Full reaction:

Confrontation with "hallejinjte" submitted

I don't know how my lawyers have their agenda for tomorrow, but here's my opinion: SPAK prosecutors have hidden, lied about or don't refer documents:

1. They hid the confirmation of land ownership from the owner families, including the Begeja family (due to the non-proceeding of Taulant Balles' false report). They made part of the false evidence file of Taulant Balles and others, BUT they hid the Official Notebooks that show that there was no expropriation but a temporary requisition. The ownership of the land was the cause of Balle's defamation and the basis of his criminal complaint!

2. SPAK prosecutors lied (and this lie became part of the decision of GJKKO) as if the owner families requested the property after 2005, when in fact the owners requested it as early as 1995, and even in the documents of the investigation file they are included not only the requests but also the decisions of the former property restitution commissions that have recognized and partially returned the property to the legal owners since 1995 and onwards.

3. Prosecutors of SPAK lied and this lie became part of the decision of GJKKO as if the Begeja family owns 4400 m2 outside the Club and should be reduced. In fact, the owner families had over 21,000 m2 more than the surface of the two clubs together. The Begeja family not only had 28,200 m2 inside the territory that was usurped by the former Club, but also had 3,847 m2 beyond the former Club, from which today it appears that Carlo Bolino's company robbed them of about 1,500 m2.

4. They hid the letters from the socialist Ministers Angjeli and Klosi in 2005 for the initiation of the privatization procedures, although they were made known to them already 5 months ago when they sent you an attached lawsuit for a false report by Taulant Balla.

5. They ignore the change of destination by Edi Rama with decision KRRT 132/j dated 08.06.2006 by misrepresenting as if it was approved by KRRTRSH which was led by Sali Berisha at the end of November 2006. But KRRTRSH has never passed any approval without the decision of KRRT that Tirana.

Even when in 2005 the government went against the municipality in the case of the Black Bird, Edi Rama brought to Tirana the President of the Committee of Local Authorities of the Council of Europe on January 17, 2006 and there is an Official Communication from that institution that stated that the KRRTRSH could not intervene since territorial planning is a function of the local government and Albania must respect the Charter of Local Autonomy of the Council of Europe.

6. They hid (and did not refer to) the Begeja family's contract with the construction company in 2007, where it was foreseen that they could enter into a joint investment of up to 25% of their share.

7. They hid (did not refer to) the building site permit signed by Edi Rama on 19.12.2007 and disclosed on 06.01.2008.

8. They hid (did not refer to) the conditional construction permit approved by the KRRT of Edi Rames in February 2008.

9. They hid the court decision of the forgery of the former pool. They wrote that the instruction for deletion from the ZRPP (presented by the former director of the ZRPP and the former Minister to deal with thousands of forgeries in the ZRPP) was repealed after a few years by the Constitutional Court, but it does not show that this case was tried for 7 years and there is a decision cut form that was a forgery.

10. They had hidden the decisions of the courts of the first instance and of the 2008-2010 Appeal, which stated that the permission is called given when it is approved and not when it is disclosed by Edi Rama.

11. They had hidden the 3 illegal documents of the Chief Inspector of the Urban Construction Inspectorate of Edi Rames issued in 2010 after the Court's decision of the cut form had come out. These 3 illegal documents were also submitted to SPAK 5 months ago, attached to the report for Taulant Ballen.

12. They had hidden the decisions of the courts of the first instance and of the Appeal for the reward that found Edi Ramen in embezzlement with around 330,000 euros! Is Edi Rama ABOVE THE LAW? That in the 200 pages of the decision where guards and my children are mentioned, the name of Edi Rames is not mentioned even though he has caused a financial DEM of 330,000 euros!

13. They hid the Functional Zoning maps presented by Urbaplan in December 2008, which are signed by Edi Rama and 10 directors of the Municipality, which change the destination of the entire large area of ??the former Club from a sports area to a "Residential Zone with medium parameters and urban high". SPAK has hidden the decision of KRRT to Edi Rames no. 238 dated 27.12.2008 and accompanying maps.

14. They hid the land purchase contracts from Prof. The wealth was within the co-owners of the Begeja family, as well as among the co-owners of other families (Saliaga, Llagami and Alimehmeti). They have seized all the contracts from all the relevant notaries in Tirana, so hiding the documents is a waste of duty. These contracts have been hidden from the narrative of Taulant Balles that Malltezi entered with 114 m2 (although they could make a division to confirm that Prof. Malltezi had 410 m2 from the inheritance), Prof. Malltezi also bought more than 2,100 m2 from the co-owners.

15. They hid 350 contracts for the sale of apartments and shops, starting with obtaining the building permit and when physical construction had not yet begun (2010-2011). Sale in the pit with contracts with

price 20% lower than the market was used to secure the financing of the project, the rest were loans.

16. Prosecutors of SPAK have made several pages of insinuations in the mass decision that the former Club was in the Plan of the Spread of the Armed Forces or not. There are 3 years of investigation and over 30 letters with the Ministry of Defense, the Army Headquarters and the Presidency about when it was and when it was taken out of the Expansion Plan. What comes out? It was NOT part of the Expansion Plan even in 2004! SPAK prosecutors have several confirmations, including 9 days before they imprisoned Prof. Maltezin that the former Club was not in the Expansion Plan even in 2004 and yet they have left in the decision of the measure several pages of insinuations, perhaps unexplained! Plus they tried to undo an official document with false evidence.

17. The prosecutors of SPAK lied and this lie became part of the decision of GJKKO as if the sports clubs were functioning normally while there are (i) forms with the firm of Edi Rames at the time that all the facilities were forcibly occupied (ii) a letter from the Deputy Minister of Sports of 2006 which writes that the Ministry of Sports did not even take inventory of the Multisports Club as it is occupied by informal families, and (iii) the Ministry of Defense neither owned nor administered the former Club.

18. SPAK prosecutors, apart from hiding the decision of the KRRT of Edi Rames no. 238 of 27.12.2008 and accompanying maps, have also hidden/misrepresented the General Regulatory Plan of 2012 which was incorporated into the functional zoning map approved in that decision. That functional zoning of December 2008 presents the entire area in question as "Residential Zone with high urban parameters".

19. They had hidden (did not refer to) the Decision of

City Council no. 57, dated 24.12.2012, which approved the General Regulatory Plan of Tirana, which also provided for the school on the land owned by the

they left "VAKEF" but Edi Rama signed 4 VKM to forgive Carlo Bolinos.

20. Edi Rames' public orders to SPAK, both at the SP Congress on May 09, 2022, and at the SP Assembly on April 07, 2022, to prosecute Sali Berishen, were hidden. "SPAK has an obligation... OUR PATIENCE IS RUNNING OUT... SPAK is delegitimizing SPAK and the entire justice reform!" The political prosecutors submitted to the order of Edi Rames.





Lajmet e fundit nga