Irena Gjoka accuses/ Argita Malltezi: This act shows three aspects, it is misusing justice

2024-10-19 13:39:00, Aktualitet CNA

Irena Gjoka accuses/ Argita Malltezi: This act shows three aspects, it is

Argita Malltezi reacted after the report by judge Irena Gjoka, who asked SPAK to investigate her statements.

Malltezi in a long reaction emphasizes that this act proves three aspects that Gjoka has chosen to hide behind her colleagues and misuse justice.

Malltezi says that the action of judge Irena Gjoka shows her problem with violations of the law.

Malltez's reaction

I have been informed by the media about the report of the judge, a symbol of judicial reform, former chairperson of GJKKO, judge Spata Maneku Gjoka. I do not know the object and content of the act because I have not yet received notification. But whatever dress Ms. Spata Maneku Gjoka has decided to wear to her problems with her past and her present, this act proves three aspects:

First, in the show in question, I asked questions and at the same time called on the media to investigate, to ask SPAK if there is such a case and whether an investigation is being conducted. I believe this should please the judge with three surnames and even anyone else, convinced of his purity, would make a clarifying statement and call on SPAK to investigate and react. Mrs. Spata Maneku Gjoka has chosen to hide behind her colleagues, which reveals the second corrupt aspect of the system, the misuse of justice.

There is no legal provision that gives SPAK the right to investigate cases where the complainant or defendant is a prosecutor or special justice judge. This is an extralegal and abusive practice created by them. This practice is used by judges and prosecutors of special bodies (GJKKO, SPAK) so that through each other they wash their hands of the criminal offenses they commit themselves.

In any other court or prosecutor's office in the country, a case against a judge or prosecutor would be transferred to another judicial district for investigation and trial in order to avoid illegal influences, but this does not apply to the case of special branch kamikazes.

Thirdly, the act of the lady who juggles the surnames is related to her big problem with the violation of the law. I have reported to the Prosecutor's Office of Tirana the prosecutors Millonai and Kraja, the judge Spata Maneku Gjoka and the judge Oldashiper of a series of criminal offenses in the procedure of the case of KP, specifically the criminal offense "Abuse of duty" in cooperation provided by article 248 of the Penal Code "Committing arbitrary actions" provided by article 250 of the Code and "Failure to take measures to stop the illegal situation" provided by article 251 of the Criminal Code

The Tirana Prosecutor's Office forwarded this report to SPAK, without notifying me. The colleagues of Kraja e Millonai, who are also controllers of GJKKO, i.e. protectors of Gjoka and Olldashi assets, have decided not to start the proceedings. This decision will certainly be appealed, the law-breaking prosecutors and judges know very well that the corrupt decision-making of their colleagues can delay them, but they can never erase the punishment of the criminal acts consumed by them in this case. So the lady in question thinks she can offer a bargain by raising such issues.

However, I appreciate this occasion as an excellent opportunity to ask the adjective juggler the questions that I asked publicly. Have you been expelled from Greece for criminal offences?

Is there a video found in the house of the journalist who has already left Albania, in which she was recorded with the intention of blackmail, negotiating with a former deputy of the SP to receive the sum of 500 thousand euros in exchange for exculpatory legal facilities for this ex - deputy?

SPAK is a public body and has the obligation to clarify if there is such a circumstance to public opinion, so I once again call on it to answer this question, which is in the public's interest. I also encourage the media to ask and investigate this matter./ CNA