2 hours in SPAK for the ÇEZ-DIA affair/ Meta reveals details from the interrogation, accusations against the Government

2023-11-08 11:30:00, Politikë CNA

2 hours in SPAK for the ÇEZ-DIA affair/ Meta reveals details from the

Chairman of the Freedom Party, Ilir Meta

The Chairman of the Freedom Party, Ilir Meta, came out after about 2 hours from the premises of SPAK, where he testified about the ÇEZ-DIA file.

Meta said that he did not sign any letter or document that could implicate him in the CEZ-DIA affair.

He threw accusations at the Government, as he declared that he is using this issue politically to divert attention from the scandals.

"It was reopened in December 2019 with an accuser who has been convicted twice for defamation, a person who was an employee of DIA, is now OSHEE. It is being used by the regime for defamation, a person who gave a testimony in court where my name was not mentioned anywhere and then because of the problems he had was used in this case. My answer is again what I said before and what I am saying again and I will emphasize it, there is no act, document, documentation, no order, no initiative for laws, by-laws, from Meta as Minister of Economy in the interest of anyone. including DIA and CEZ. The Ministry of Economy has denounced the decision of ERE that favored CEZ in December 2012 for the price of energy purchases. I was like a person who knows about certain circumstances. I was asked about various details that have no importance.

I have explained in the past, before public opinion. No act, document, document, decision by Meta as Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy or in other positions in the interest of anyone. It is dictated by Rama to avoid attention from scandals, to shift attention to rumors related to 15 years ago. Interrogations have become fashionable because we have a government that wants to avoid attention from scandals, from the incinerator. I am here, I will be transparent about every decision-making act that I have taken in the past", he said.

Meta emphasized that he was interrogated as a person who has knowledge of certain circumstances, without specifying which circumstances are specifically in question.

"I was asked as a person who has knowledge of certain circumstances. I was asked about various details which have no importance", he underlined./ CNA