web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

E fundit!

x

The confusion caused by the Supreme Court of Professor Sadushi, explained by the Attorney General

2025-10-14 20:26:00, Aktualitet CNA

The confusion caused by the Supreme Court of Professor Sadushi, explained by the

Part of the Attorney General's statement shows the mess that the Supreme Court's decision has caused in the system.

De jure, the Supreme Court under the new system is organized to serve primarily as a systematizer of decision-making through the adoption of unifying decisions.

But de facto Sokol Sadushi is using the Supreme Court and the fact that he has control over the review of appeals as a means of pressure on magistrates.

Olsian Çela:
We have cases where first instance prosecutors complain about decisions of the Appeals Court, we have reached a day where prosecutors put into question what the Appeals Court decides. They write letters, they address institutions and embassies where they raise issues related to the legality of the appeals courts. It is unacceptable and inconceivable. This is because a system has been set up where prosecutors, especially young ones, do not understand the place and position of the prosecutor.

To add fuel to the fire, we have the judicial practice, the decision of the Supreme Court, I don't want to comment on decisions but it has to do with the functionality of the Prosecutor's Office. The Supreme Court says that 'the first instance prosecutor can exercise recourse in the High Court, at a time when the Appeals Prosecutor has given up on the Appeal'.

Because in the name of the independence of prosecutors, the independence of the first instance prosecutor is violated if the prosecutor of the Appeals or the General Prosecutor's Office exercises his duty. And you, sir, tell me "how many cases have you represented in the High Court?" 38 cases. We have two problems, a court that interferes with the functionality, the constitutional organization of the institution. This destroys the role that the Prosecutor of the Appeals and the Prosecutor of the General Prosecutor's Office have, today we have turned the hierarchy upside down.

The Prosecutor General cannot take a position on what the First Instance Prosecutor has decided, nor have my opinion, I have to go and read what the First Instance Prosecutor has said. But hey, when we have it to read, why should he go?! We don't need a prosecutor at all, these are the problems of misunderstanding and organization./ CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga