web counter
LEXO PA REKLAMA!

SHKARKO APP

App Store
Google Play

E fundit!

x

The Sadducees' use of the High Judge as their own housekeeper

2025-11-06 15:09:00, Aktualitet CNA

The Sadducees' use of the High Judge as their own housekeeper

The Supreme Court has been publicly used at least 3 times this year alone as a cover for Sokol Sadushi's machinations.

It was used as a cover for the falsification that Sokol Sadushi made of the voting and the minutes of the selection of candidates for a position on the Constitutional Court, a name for the Supreme Court. In that case, it was clearly understood from the audio recordings that the decision was made by Sadushi, while the members of the technical commission were simply his spokesmen.

That decision belonged to the members of the Supreme Court, not the technical commission, and the audio also included contestations of the disqualification of the vote for Naureda Llagami.

But the documents produced did not reflect a vote against. It should be made clear that the documentation, including the minutes of the members' voting, are documents that are produced afterwards. Without cameras and without audio.

Did the members who immediately contested the invalidation of the ballot change their minds along the way, or do the documents not contain any data at all about contesting the invalidation of that vote?

Ms. Llagami has appealed the decision to the Constitutional Court, but this is an investigation by SPAK and not one of the administrative issues that Sadushi prefers to resolve in the Constitutional Court.

It remains that in this case, Sokol Sadushi spoke, chose, contested, and sealed on behalf of the Supreme Court. No one opposed him!

 

The second case is when Sokol Sadushi drafted, published in the media and publicly pressured the Administrative Court to have Llagami lose the trial. There is no doubt that it was Sadushi who also wrote the decision to the Administrative Court judge.

That decision practically states that Sadushi's decision to disqualify Llagami is unappealable.

Is there a decision that cannot be appealed? Or is there none except those written by Sadushi?

The case is being reviewed very quickly in the Constitutional Court and perhaps there Sadushi will write differently and consider it appealable, only in the Constitutional Court every letter he produces himself, but the fact remains that Sadushi even in that case used the High Court as his property. Meanwhile, the pressure exerted publicly is a topic for SPAK and not for the people's court that goes after the berihaji of Sadushi's "agency" in the media.

The third case is related to statements made by Sokol Sadushi on a draft of a new Criminal Code. At every round table where that draft is discussed, Sokol Sadushi lies publicly. He is even systematic in his lies.

Beyond the reasoning that someone who lies publicly has no problem falsifying when he is in his own office, even when Sadushi lies, he lies in the name of the Supreme Court.

And none of the members of the Supreme Court has spoken out. Not even the member who participated in the consultations on the new draft Criminal Code.

Why does this happen?

Why does Sokol Sa-dush regularly use the Supreme Court as merchandise for his shop and others remain silent?

Did Sadushi line them up, or did it make it convenient for all the other members to hide behind Sadushi?

At the moment, it seems like everyone is hiding behind the Sadushi Court, which only reviews 19% of criminal cases and 26% of administrative cases, which are selected by the criterion "Sadushi knows how"./CNA





Lajmet e fundit nga