E fundit!

12:17 TODAY

Murder of the officer/ Berisha: The killer was financed by state funds

DP leader Sali Berisha has reacted to recently revealed de...

"Don't talk to anyone, if you need money, tell me"/ The testimony of the former director of BYL-A, how she was blackmailed by Bushka

2025-02-11 10:07:00, Politikë CNA

"Don't talk to anyone, if you need money, tell me"/ The testimony

CNA has secured the decision of the Criminal Court of Kosovo, which also reveals the role of Klotilda Bushka, how the socialist MP is involved in criminal activity, in defense of Erion Veliaj and Ajola Xoxa.

The court has concluded that all of the statements made by the former director of BYUL, Ina Goxhaj, were true, that her phone was taken away to be destroyed and she was given a new iPhone by Ajola Xoxa.

Goxhaj has revealed that he felt pressured after being told by Klotilda Bushka not to reveal anything and to deny everything related to Ajola Xoxa.

"Also, the statements of this citizen regarding the change of her mobile phone are found to be supported by the results obtained from the letter No. FRS/3056/IB dated 26.12.2024, received by the proceeding body from the company Vodafone Sh.a. From this telephone company, information has been administered that the telephone number +355696152417 is registered in the name of citizen Ina Goxhaj, with personal No. 185524116P, date of birth 24.05.1988, for which the form of the user of electronic communications services has also been completed. Attached to this form is a copy of the Identity Card in the name of citizen Ina Goxhaj, with Personal No. 185524116P, issued on 06.05.2009. Likewise, the telephone company has made available the phone calls/sms, which reflect the numbers that have called or were called by citizen Ina Goxhaj, for the period 01.12.2023 to 18.12.2024, along with the IMEI identifiers of the interlocutors.

136.2.3. From the material analyzed for outgoing calls, it is evident that from 01.12.2023 until 10.12.2024 at 20:07, this telephone number was used on the mobile phone with IMEI 356835259288980. The last outgoing call was at 20:07, with a duration of 10 seconds, to the mobile phone number 0695528178. The last incoming flow turns out to be an SMS from Vodafone at 22:51 on 10.12.2024. In the following, it is reflected that for the telephone number +355696152417, from 11.12.2024 at 8:35 to 12.12.2024 at 11:35, a telephone number with No. IMEI 358934999288980. This coincides with this citizen's statements regarding the use for a few hours of another device, which must belong to her mother.

Then, from the material analyzed for outgoing flows, it is evident that from 13.12.2024 at 02:38 and until 18.12.2024 at 14:19, the telephone number of citizen Ina Goxhaj was used on the device with IMEI 357014745814170. The first incoming flow for this IMEI is on 13.12.2024, at 02:36, in the form of a message, while the last incoming flow is on 18.12.2024, at 17:44, in the form of a message. These data coincide with the statements of citizen Ina Goxhaj regarding the change of her mobile device. In conclusion, the fact is proven that until 10.12.2024 Ina Goxhaj had a telephone with IMEI 356835259288980 and since 13.12.2024, citizen Ina Goxhaj has changed her telephone with IMEI 357014745814170. From open sources it results that IMEI numbers that start with 35 belong to iPhone brand telephones. This data also coincides with the statements of the citizen in question, related to the replacement of her Samsung brand mobile phone with an iPhone brand device, "the Court's decision provided by CNA states.

Further, former director Ina Goxhaj said that Bushka called her to the office to tell her not to talk to anyone about the things she knows and offered her money to keep her mouth shut.

"Questioned again on 17.01.2025 as a person who has knowledge of the criminal offense, citizen Ina Goxhaj explains, among other things, that:

He was contacted again by state representative Klotilda Busha on Tuesday.

The declarant explains that while she was working in the office of the Ombudsman, at around 2:30 p.m., the institution's driver, a citizen named Tasim, called her and said that someone was looking for her from outside. The driver then told her to go to the Ombudsman's office. The declarant explains that when she entered the office, she found Ombudsman Erinda Ballanca and citizen Klotilda Bushka there.

The declarant explains that at first I greeted both of them, then, state official Klotilda Bushka winked at her, a gesture which she (the declarant) understood as a signal not to tell what had happened to me during the month of December and the meetings she had had.

After some conversations on personal topics, the declarant explains that the state Erinda Ballanca has left the office and is left alone with Klotilda Bushka. The latter has started to ask her if she is better and if she has calmed down from the situation created last month. Also, Klotilda Bushka has asked her if she had any concerns from Spak, asking her if she had been called again. The declarant has replied that she has not had any concerns and is very calm.

The declarant further explains that Klotilda Bushka told her that she had a concern about the declarations to the HIDAKKI that she herself was making, referring to the invoice she had in her file issued by her husband Altin Bushka, for the NATO 2022 activity, and asked her who was aware of this invoice. The declarant told her that she had only spoken to Greta Kokalari about this invoice and that she had then written to Altin, telling him that he should make an invoice.

The declarant states that Klotilda's concern was whether or not this conversation about the invoice in question had taken place with Adela Kondakçiu, as it actually did. However, the declarant denied this.

At one point, the declarant explains that Klotilda Bushka said that "Adela has brought us many consequences and is a negative person with whom we have collaborated." In this regard, the declarant explains that Klotilda ordered her several times during the conversation not to talk to Adela and not to have any kind of communication with her. Klotilda Bushka even told her not to have any communication with her (the declarant's) family members regarding the meeting she (Klotilda) had.

Then, the declarant explains that Klotilda Bushka told her that her lawyer would call her to ask how she was, as she was very worried about her situation. Also, RE Klotilda Bushka told her that Romina could call her, regarding a power of attorney that she (the declarant) would issue and sign. If she were called back to Spak, Klotilda Bushka told her that she would be represented by a lawyer. The declarant agreed to sign the power of attorney that was proposed to her. The declarant explains that Klotilda told her "don't worry, for anything, you will have us. And please don't talk to anyone on the phone". The declarant explains that the citizen Klotilda Bushka asked her several times not to talk on the phone about the incident.

Then, the declarant explains that citizen Klotilda Bushka told her that if they called her again in Spak, she should not tell how Klotilda had taken her phone. Klotilda Bushka, the declarant explains, instructed her that if the proceeding body were to ask about the phone, she should state that the current phone (the one given to her by citizen Ajola Xoxa) had been in her house for years and had simply been using it recently and finally the declarant states that while greeting Klotilda, the latter told her, "If you need anything, even money, just tell us," the GJKKO decision disclosed by CNA./CNA