E fundit!

14:32 Editorial Elvi FUNDO

Who is protesting?!

The ten-day protest that began in Tirana after an incident...

DEnunciation: Rama-Bollino violations for the privatization of the building at the former Partizani complex

2023-12-06 13:37:00, Politikë CNA

DEnunciation: Rama-Bollino violations for the privatization of the building at

Sali Berisha

Former Prime Minister Sali Berisha stated in the press conference with journalists that Edi Rama has changed the VKM of the "Albania 1 euro" initiative for its use for the construction of televisions, specifically to build the television building of Carlo Bollino.

"So, this decision comes in flagrant violation of the law on restitution and compensation of property, which stipulates in point two of article 31, that any alienation of state or public property, be it, automatically goes to the expropriated person", says Berisha.

The head of the DP further adds that Rama and Bollino are either the owners of the building, or have falsified the declared balances.

Berisha's full speech:

Rama and Bolino in their documentary state that 'Albania 1 euro' is an initiative of the Berisha government to stimulate foreign investments in the country, the procedures are detailed in VKM 54 of the Rama government of 2014, i.e. 5 years before Report TV of benefit.
I want to clarify here that the 'Albania 1 euro' initiative is an initiative of the DP government, but it is true that it did not imagine it as an initiative for the construction of pro-government televisions and the corruption of the media. It was undertaken as an initiative that would encourage foreign investments, especially in the poor areas of the country.
But it is Edi Rama who adds to his VKM, the use of this initiative for the construction of televisions.
What I can say is that the change in the VKM, which also benefited investments in televisions, was made by the government of Rama, after the initial approval of VKM 54 and was made in 2015. We also clarified the last change made, which the right for privatization is granted.
So, with this change, Rama not only gives to televisions, but in point 8, fraction 4, VKM 54 of 2014, it is stated: In lease or emfeteosis contracts, concluded for property where the land area is over 500 square meters, in cases where the tenant company has made investments to the extent of 150 percent of the value of the land and has respected the terms of the contract, the subjects have the right to direct privatization of the object of the contract according to the legislation in force.
So, this decision comes in flagrant violation of the Law of Property Restitution and Compensation, which stipulates in point two of Article 31, that any alienation of state or public property, be it, automatically goes to the expropriated person.
After these changes in VKM, Rama-Bolino have entered into contractual relations with the state, with the government.
In their public fraud documentary, they say that contrary to what Berisha slanders, Report TV has not become the owner of anything, remember this, but has only signed a lease contract in exchange for a symbolic rent of 1 euro, the law and the government compel it to hire a significant number of employees and to make a costly investment, most of which remains the property of the state.
This is another fraud of the Rama-Bolino duo, since in the balance sheets of the company MTSC ShPK, for the years 20-22, a value of 265 million ALL is reflected as long-term assets in process in the balance sheet of 2022.
What are these? It is the construction, which was not absolutely owned, it was owned by the state. Bolino himself claims that he owned nothing, except television sets.
So what else has he reported? This is another balance, from 2019. These are tax reports. If he did not consider them his own, he has a separate voice, but not with long-term material assets. 45 million because that was the investment in the building at that time. Later, the investment reached 265 million.
So, according to national accounting standards, in the asset item are recorded: The economic entity recognizes the cost of an item of AAMs only as an asset, if and only if the asset is controlled by the economic entity, it is possible that from the use of the asset, it will economic benefits flow to the entity and the cost of the asset can be measured reliably.
The initial registration of AAM is usually done at the time of its acquisition or production benefit.
Finally, if it is clear to Rama-Bolino that they are not the owners of the building, they have falsified the balances declared in the tax administration and have committed a serious criminal offense. For three years in a row this forgery and this is punishable by law.