The most slanderous propagandists of the government

2025-07-29 18:37:00, Opinione Ermal Mulosmani

The most slanderous propagandists of a government are those who accept the defects but relativize them.
Look at the title of Pjeshka. "The liberal dictatorship of Edi Rama" - he says.
In the hope that some naive person will read what he has rambled on. The essence is immediately understood.
What kind of dictator can a liberal be? - is the subtext of Pjeshka.
Then is he compared to Berisha?! Who commanded all the powers, who killed if you protested against him; who used justice, who did not open the boxes, etc. etc. He has been both a dictator and an illiberal. Let him not come back to us.
Now, this Edi Rama, really commands corner by corner and dictates everything, but he lets you protest, lets you get a vote, and even counts the votes correctly. So he is really an Emperor, but in his Empire there is also room for an opposition vote...

The truth is that this is the biggest illiberal.
Rama does not steal votes and opens the boxes as often as you want because he knows very well, from before, the result of those boxes. The engineering of the vote allows Edi Rama to even mock the Opposition: "Do you want to count them again"?
The greatest drama of democracy is not the exact counting of the votes. It is its initial, elementary drama, of the first years. We encountered this phenomenon during the time of Berisha. Because he did not know the result and was afraid, he ordered a vote to be stolen. He made it thick with many traces. Berisha's opposition understood and called for the boxes to be opened. But how could he open the boxes when he had stolen a vote here and there?!
He refused, refusing in fear. The opposition people would rise up: "Open the boxes or leave" and Berisha was exposed as a dictator and an illiberal.

While the "liberal" dictator, Edi Rama, not only lets you protest but also mocks the people. He tells you: "Get up, get up, but that poor guy won't get up."
Edi Rama doesn't steal from the box, he buys the people with power clients (businessmen), patronageists, government officials and criminals. This amalgam of interests is like an octopus tentacle that captures the electorate (even confused) for the interest of the moment.
There is a capillary pyramid in every polling station, in every residential building, in every voter. A patronageist-a voter-a financier.

Where has it ever been seen that the Prime Minister of a country says 10 days before the elections with a millimeter accuracy the exact result of their election better than all the most famous polls?!
This is achieved only when capillary data from the field announces it. The only guarantee is the buying and conditioning of the vote.
I had the opportunity during these elections to understand that a very well-known businessman, a millionaire, was asking feverishly about the result of a mini-municipality with two or three centers. He had taken it upon himself to do so.
He asked about every vote counted, anxiously as if it were the result of a multi-million tender. It was not the poor man's fault. The success of his business in the next 4 years depended on the result of those three voting centers. He had to get +1400 votes. He
trembled like a perch when they went to +1300.
"How many votes are left to count?" - he asked with his mouth dry from anxiety. When he got the number, he celebrated like crazy. But Peach doesn't know these things.

This is why Edi Rama lets you protest, lets you open the boxes, lets you get some votes. Because he has managed the result. This is not liberalism, this is fake liberalism, it is asphyxiation, paralysis. It is like the murders of Putin's opponents. They take the poison over time and die a little every day.
Until the death is called natural and the Peaches declare: "He died of a tonsillitis infection".
That is why I feel like vomiting when I see these devil's advocates giving us theoretical lectures on democracy./ CNA